Sandhya Kathaसंध्या कथा

Hanumān Wrote One Too

Vālmīki climbs a mountain to read the Rāmāyaṇa somebody else wrote, and finds it is better than his. What happens next is Hanumān's decision, not his.

Published by Sandhya Katha · Updated

Hanumannāṭaka (Mahānāṭaka) — The traditional account of how the play came to exist

Tradition note. Carried down rather than written down: we could find no early text that tells it. It comes with the Sanskrit play Hanumannāṭaka, whose own tradition says the play was built from a stone fragment of Hanumān's writing found in King Bhoja's reign. The play is real and translated.

Ages 9+6 min aloudletting the better one go
Illustration for Hanumān Wrote One Too
Illustration
Full · 6 min aloud

After the war was over, after was crowned and the city had stopped celebrating and everyone had gone home to their own lives, went up into the mountains by himself.

He had been in the story. He had crossed the sea for it, walked into a burning city and out again, and carried the news that she was alive.

And now it was over, and he wanted to write it down. Not for anybody. Just written down once, the way it had been.

pause

He had no paper and no ink and nothing to make them from, so he used what was there. He wrote on the rock faces of the mountain, cutting the letters with his nails, one line at a time.

It took years, and nobody was watching him do it. When he finished, the whole thing stood along the mountainside in the open air, where there was nobody to read it.

pause

Then came up the mountain.

Vālmīki was writing a of his own — the one we have, the one every telling since has come from, including this one. He had heard there was another, and came to see it.

He walked along the rock face reading it, beginning to end. Then he sat down on one of the stones and said nothing at all.

pause

Because Hanumān's was better.

The story is not interested in explaining how. It does not say Hanumān had a better ear, or knew things Vālmīki could not have known. It says only that Vālmīki read it and knew, the way you know, and that he could not get up off the stone afterwards.

Hanumān waited a while, and then asked him what was wrong.

Understand what Vālmīki had put in. Years of it. He had found the metre for it and then built the whole thing inside that metre, line after line, and he had done it well enough that we still have every word.

And Vālmīki told him, which took some getting out. If this one existed, nobody was going to read his. Not out of unfairness. Just because people read the better one.

pause

Hanumān stood up and started gathering the rocks.

All of them. Every slab, all those years of them, stacked and carried in armfuls to the edge of the mountain. And then he threw the whole thing into the sea.

Vālmīki ran after him shouting. What have you done?

And Hanumān said — this is the part of the story people remember — that he had not written it for readers. He had written it for Rāma. It was finished the moment it was finished. It had already done every single thing it was for, and being read was never one of them.

pause

Vālmīki went back down the mountain and wrote his. It is what we have. It is a great poem, and it is the one this whole collection comes out of — and it is the one we have partly because somebody decided it should be.

pause

That washed-up piece is the last part of the story, and it is a good one.

An age afterwards — long enough that the war had become something people only had poems about — a broken stone with writing on it came out of the sea.

A trader found it. It was carried inland to a king called , and he read a line of it standing there and knew exactly what he was holding.

Most of it was gone. He gave what was left to a poet at his court and told him to make something of it, and the poet did, and that is the play.

pause

So a piece of the thing Hanumān threw away came back as a play, most of it missing, finished by somebody else, an age too late to matter to him.

slow down hereHe gave away the best thing he ever made and did not appear to feel it as a loss.

Short · 3 min aloud

After the war was over, after was king and everyone had gone home to their own lives, went up into the mountains by himself.

He had been in the story. He had crossed the sea for it and carried the news back. Now he wanted to write it down — not for anyone, just written down, the way it had been.

He had no paper and no ink. So he wrote it on the rocks, with his nails, one line at a time, and it took him years.

pause

And came up the mountain to read it.

Vālmīki was writing a too. His is the one we have. His is the one everybody has.

He walked along the rock face, reading. When he got to the end he sat down on one of the stones and did not say anything for a long time.

pause

Because Hanumān's was better.

The story does not explain how. It just says he read it, and knew, and could not get up.

Hanumān watched his face and asked what was wrong. And Vālmīki said the true thing, which was a hard thing to say out loud: that now nobody would ever read his.

pause

So Hanumān got up. He gathered the rocks — all of them, all those years of them — carried them to the edge of the mountain, and threw them into the sea.

Vālmīki shouted at him. What have you done?

And Hanumān said he had not written it for readers. He had written it for Rāma. It was finished the moment it was finished, and it had already done everything it was for.

pause

The Rāmāyaṇa people have been reading ever since is Vālmīki's, and it is a great poem, and it is the one we have partly because Hanumān wanted it that way.

slow down hereThe strongest one in the story turned out to be strong about something else entirely.

Now turn to your child

He worked on it for years and then threw it in the sea. Do you think he was sad about it?

And if they shrug, you can leave it at this: Making a thing and being known for it are two different wants, and you can have the first without the second.

If they ask: “Why was Hanumān's better?”

The story refuses to say, and that is worth noticing. It does not claim he wrote better lines or knew things Vālmīki did not. It only says Vālmīki read it and could tell. Anyone who gives you a reason is adding one.

If they ask: “How do we know about this one?”

It was carried by memory rather than written down — we could not find an early text that tells it. What you can put your hands on is the play it comes with, the Hanumannāṭaka, which people have been reading for around a thousand years.

If they ask: “Is Hanumān's Rāmāyaṇa still out there?”

One broken piece of it came out of the sea long afterwards and became the play. The rest is still down there.

Something isn't right here

If a name, a detail or a tradition is wrong here, tell us. Nobody needs an account and we do not ask who you are — so please leave your own details out of the box.

Related storyThe First Poem Was an Accidentthe same poet, at the other end of his life, on the day the first line arrived without being asked for

This is the complete telling. Sandhya Katha chooses one for your child's age and the calendar each night — free, nothing to install.

Open tonight's pick

If you know a parent who would read this to their child tonight, this is the whole of how Sandhya Katha travels.